That's what a most secure smartphone is really for

The topic of digital and mobile privacy has been hotly disputed for a while, with many people employing the tired argument that they have nothing to hide and don't worry about being watched.

To quote Edward Snowden “Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." "When you say, 'I have nothing to hide,' you're saying, 'I don't care about this right’”.

What does that mean ?

First of all, it's important to realize the distinction between being private and concealing things. Everybody has areas of their lives they choose to keep secret. Real privacy gives you the power to decide which pieces of your life you want to share with others. It means that rather than being forced to share, you get to decide what and when to do so. That’s what a best privacy phone, a most secure smartphone an encrypted phone or an untraceable phone do.

Would you want everyone to be able to see you get dressed and clean up if you want to take a shower or a bath, for instance? The likelihood is that you cherish your privacy and are not genuinely hiding from anyone, thus the answer is probably no.

Many of the things you do online follow the same rule. Another illustration: Would you want everyone to be able to see an intimate photo of yourself that you select to share to a loved one? Once more, the answer is most likely "no," and once more that’s why we need to use the best privacy phone, the most secure smartphone an encrypted phone or an untraceable.

If we apply the same rationale to all of your digital communication and personal data, you should be able to maintain your privacy from everyone else, including governments and law enforcement agencies.

Governments and law enforcement agencies, in particular, continue to push for the removal of end- to-end encryption of communications so that they can access people's mobile communications.
They claim that only criminals would need it.

However, how do you tell the difference between surveillance to protect as they sometimes justify it, and surveillance to control? When in doubt, let's keep our free will. The freedom of expression, the freedom to have a private life should not be sacrificed for more control.

Who watches those who watch us? Who can question those who monitor?

Denying this digital and mobile privacy and eliminating end-to-end encryption of communication transfers power from the many to the few.

In reality we should never have come to use the best privacy phone, the most secure smartphone an encrypted phone or an untraceable,this should have been the norm if we had made the right decisions few years ago.